Wow, I had no idea this was a thing. I'm both amused and disturbed. You are such a good writer, Stuart. How are you cranking out smart, thorough essays this quickly? Please don't burn yourself out.
That paper where rats are exposed to constant light vs light:dark cycles is going to seriously mess with their circadian clocks. I suspect that it’s the effect on the clock that produces whatever effect they claim, and that’s not located anywhere near the testicles.
“Bromeopathy” had me in stitches
Wow, I had no idea this was a thing. I'm both amused and disturbed. You are such a good writer, Stuart. How are you cranking out smart, thorough essays this quickly? Please don't burn yourself out.
Far too kind! I'm planning for next week's one to be a tiny bit shorter.
I might be wrong, but is Tucker showing us the size of his tool? He seems so insecure.
That might have been a factor in my choice of this specific image...
That paper where rats are exposed to constant light vs light:dark cycles is going to seriously mess with their circadian clocks. I suspect that it’s the effect on the clock that produces whatever effect they claim, and that’s not located anywhere near the testicles.
A very good point. But with work of this quality level, I expect they were a million miles away from considering alternative explanations.
The nurse who applied the UV light to the scroti may have had something to do with it, and may have cheered the poor guys up.
did you try the experiment yourself? if so, anecdotal feeling(s)?